ARCHANA KUMARI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/26408/2025 · 2025-08-06
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83894 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83894 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:134190 Court No. - 77 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26408 of 2025 Petitioner :- Archana Kumari And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents.
2. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital/live-in life of petitioners, has been sought.
3. At the very outset, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No.149 of 2025, under Section 87, 131, 352, 351(3) BNS and Sections 3(i)द, ध, 3(ii)5a of SC/ST Act, Police Station-Karanda, District- Ghazipur, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 7.8.2025 #Vik/- Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad