Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83869 (PNJ)

TILAK RAJ THROUGH HIS LR AGYAWANTI v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

RFA/3524/2016 · 2025-04-04

Anil Kshetarpal

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, TILAK RAJ STATE OTHERS CORAM: Present: ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. Court in PUNJAB V. BHAN SINGH AND ORS. (Regular First Appeal No. 641 2016 (O&M) 2. disposed of. 04.04. 2025 Poonam Sharma IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, AT CHANDIGARH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.3524 OF 2016 RESERVED ON: PRONOUNCED ON TILAK RAJ THROUGH HIS LRS AGYAWANTI VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR, GURDASPUR AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL t: Mr. R.D. Bawa, Advocate Mr. Samuel Gill, Advocate Mr. Rishabh Rana, Advocate Mr. Randhir Bawa, Advocate Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate Mr. Neeraj Kaler, Advocate Mr. Ramandeep Kaur, Advocate for Ms. Himani Kapila, Advocate Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate Mr. Narinder Kumar Vadehra, Advocate Mr. Sushil Saini, Advocate Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate Ms. Ravinder Kaur Manaise, Advocate for the landowner (s). Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate for PUDA. *** ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. For orders, see a separate detailed order of even date passed by this Court in HOUSE & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (PUDA) PUNJAB V. BHAN SINGH AND ORS. (Regular First Appeal No. 641 2016 (O&M). The miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, shall stand disposed of. 04.04. 2025 Poonam Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.3524 OF 2016 (O&M) RESERVED ON: 18.03.2025 PRONOUNCED ON: 04.04.2025 THROUGH HIS LRS AGYAWANTI APPELLANT(s) OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR, GURDASPUR AND RESPONDENT(s) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Sharma, Advocate Mr. Ramandeep Kaur, Advocate for Ms. Himani Kapila, Advocate Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate Mr. Narinder Kumar Vadehra, Advocate Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate avinder Kaur Manaise, Advocate Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate for PUDA. For orders, see a separate detailed order of even date passed by this URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (PUDA) PUNJAB V. BHAN SINGH AND ORS. (Regular First Appeal No. 641 of The miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, shall stand (ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No :Yes/No For orders, see a separate detailed order of even date passed by this URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (PUDA) of The miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, shall stand POONAM SHARMA 2025.04.19 21:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document