DR. RANDHIR SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/22239/2024 · 2025-08-05
Vinod S Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83858 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83858 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 109
CWP-22239-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.08.2025
Dr. Randhir Singh and others
...Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
Present :- Mr. Vishavjeet S. Beniwal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG Haryana. *****
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)
CM-10863-CWP-2025 The instant application has been filed for fixing the actual date of hearing in the main case. Heard. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The main case is taken up on Board for hearing today itself. Main case:
1. Prayer in the present petition is for directing the respondents to disburse the increments earned by the petitioners for the year immediately preceding the date of their retirement in consonance with the judgment dated 16.04.2024 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP-8364-2024 titled as ‘Suresh Kumar Singla and others Vs. State of Haryana and others’. 2. After arguing at some length, learned counsel appearing on MANGAL SINGH 2025.08.05 17:17 I am the author of this document
2 109
CWP-22239-2024 (O&M)
behalf of the petitioners contends that the issue involved in the present case is covered by the judgment dated 29.05.2025 passed by this Court in CWP- 15582-2025 titled as ‘Shamsher Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and others’ and other connected case(s) and the claim of the petitioners has to be considered in light of the same. 3. Learned State counsel does not dispute the aforesaid factual position and has no objection for considering the claim of the petitioners in accordance with law. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment dated 29.05.2025 passed by this Court in the matter of Shamsher Singh and others (supra). The respondent(s)- competent authority is directed to consider the claim of the petitioners in accordance with law as well as in view of the judgment dated 29.05.2025 passed by this Court in the matter of Shamsher Singh and others (supra) within a period of 03 months. 5. Needless to mention that if upon considering the said representation, in case any monetary benefit is found due and payable to the petitioners, the same shall be disbursed in their favour within a further period of 02 months. 6. All pending civil misc.
application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 05.08.2025
JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
MANGAL SINGH 2025.08.05 17:17 I am the author of this document