Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83858 (KAR)

SMT SIDDABASAVAMMA v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/27113/2023 · 2025-07-10

E S Indiresh

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25364 WP No. 27113 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.27113 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SIDDABASAVAMMA W/O LATE H. GANGADHARAPPA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT HUNNIGERE VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 562130. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.S. VARADARAJAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 560009. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION BENGALURU - 560009. 3. THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560009. 4. SRI MUNIRANGAIAH S/O RANGAIAH @ DODDARANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT HUNNIGERE VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25364 WP No. 27113 of 2023 BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 562130. 5. THE LAND TRIBUNAL REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3 & R5; SRI. CHANDRAKANTH R. GOULAY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 19.08.2023 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN REVISION PETITION NO.313/2015- 16 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND THEREBY CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R2 IN RA(BN)80/11-12 DATED 08/05/2015; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 19.08.2023 in Review Petition No.313/2015-16 (Annexure-A), confirming the order dated 08.05.2015 in RA(BN)80/2011-12. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25364 WP No. 27113 of 2023 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.4 invited the attention of the Court to the memo dated 20.06.2025 and submitted that the Land Tribunal has rejected the application made by the petitioner, seeking re-grant in respect of the land in question and accordingly, produced the Order dated 11.06.2025 in L.R.F.H.G.R.19,14,13,24/75-76, passed by respondent No.5 - the Land Tribunal. 3. In that view of the matter, as the competent Land Tribunal has rejected the application made by the petitioner herein, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. 5. Consequently, I.A.1/2024 does not survive for consideration. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18