JOGINDERO @ JOGINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB
CRM-M/39779/2025 · 2025-07-31
N S Shekhawat
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83852 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83852 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-39779-2025 -1- 222 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39779-2025 Date of Decision:31.07.2025 Jogindero @ Joginder Kaur and another …Petitioners vs. State of Punjab …Respondent
Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Prateek Pandit, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.M.S.Bajwa, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral)
1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to them in case FIR No.30 dated 28.02.2025, registered under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 333, 303(2), 324(2), 191(3), 190 of BNS, 2023, at Police Station Sultanpur, District Kapurthala.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the injuries suffered by the injured in the present case are simple in nature. He further submits that similarly placed co-accused, namely, Mandeep Kumar @ Kalu, Rohit and Priyanka @ Rinka have been granted the concession of anticipatory bail by this Court, vide orders dated 07.07.2025 passed in CRM-M-25404-2025, CRM-M-25941-2025 and CRM-M-19810-2025 (Annexures P-2 to P-4 respectively).
3. On the other hand, short reply by way of an affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub-Division Sultanpur Lodhi, Punjab has been filed HEMLATA 2025.08.01 05:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-39779-2025 -2- by learned State counsel in Court today and the same is taken on record. He has vehemently opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners on the ground that serious allegations have been levelled against the present petitioners and they do not deserve the concession of bail by this Court.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
5. In the present case, similarly placed co-accused, namely, Mandeep Kumar @ Kalu, Rohit and Priyanka @ Rinka have been granted the concession of anticipatory bail by this Court, vide orders dated 07.07.2025 (Annexures P-2 to P-4 respectively). Even the injuries suffered by the injured in the present case have been declared to be simple in nature.
6. Without commenting any further on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. The petitioners are granted concession of anticipatory bail, subject to the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. It will be open for the Investigating Officer to call the petitioner to join investigation, if so required, by issuing a written notice in this regard and he shall abide by the conditions mentioned in Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
(N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 31.07.2025
JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2025.08.01 05:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document