Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83837 (KAR)

SRI. BHAGYA JYOTHI VIDYA SAMSTHE (REGD) v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/52970/2019 · 2025-12-03

R Nataraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50383 WP No. 52970 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 52970 OF 2019 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. BHAGYA JYOTHI VIDYA SAMSTHE (REGD) NO.204/CA, 2ND STAGE, 2ND PHASE, GAYATHRI PURAM, MYSORE-570019. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SRI. SADASHIVAIAH S/O. SIDDARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/A MYSORE 2. LEADS KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA NO.204/CA, 2ND STAGE, 2ND PHASE, GAYATHRI PURAM, MYSORE-570019. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SMT. B.S. JAGADAMBA D/O SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/A MYSORE …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. OMKAR KAMBI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JHANSI RANI LAKSHMI BAI ROAD, CHAMARAJAPURAM MOHALLA, LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSURU-570005. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50383 WP No. 52970 of 2019 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. BOPANNA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; SRI.T.P.VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE "CANCELLATION ORDER" OF THE RESPONDENT NO.1 DATED 07.05.2008 (AS REFERRED IN THE COMMUNICATION DATED 25.07.2011 BEARING NO.MUDA/VAHA/-6/2011-12 VIDE ANNEXURE- K AS BEING ILLEGAL AND WITHOUT AUTHORITY OF LAW AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9