RSA-1246- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 214-A Mandi Harding Ganj Girls High School, Kapurhala and others Kamlesh Kumari CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) concurrent findings rendered by both the Courts below whereby the suit for recovery filed by the respondent along with connected second appeal bearing RSA for hearing appellants through Video Conferencing on instructions submits that -2013 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA Date of Decision: Mandi Harding Ganj Girls High School, Kapurhala and others Versus Kamlesh Kumari CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sachin Kalia, Advocate for Mr. RS Bajaj, Advocate for the appellants (through Video Conferencing). Mr. Rajinder Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant-defendants are in second appeal against the concurrent findings rendered by both the Courts below whereby the suit for recovery filed by the respondent-plaintiff was decreed. On the last date of hearing i.e. 04.03.2025, when this case along with connected second appeal bearing RSA for hearing, following order was passed by this Court: “It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondent(s) that the present appeals have infructuous as the concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the learned Courts below already stand executed long time ago. Since there is no representa appellants, in the interest of justice, adjourned to 22.5.2025. Registry to inform learned counsel for the appellant about the date fixed. Photocopy of this order be placed in the file(s) of connected matter(s).” Today, at the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the appellants through Video Conferencing on instructions submits that IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1246-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.05.2025 Mandi Harding Ganj Girls High School, Kapurhala and others .… Appellants .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sachin Kalia, Advocate for Mr. RS Bajaj, Advocate for the appellants (through Video Conferencing). Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. defendants are in second appeal against the concurrent findings rendered by both the Courts below whereby the suit plaintiff was decreed. the last date of hearing i.e. 04.03.2025, when this case along with connected second appeal bearing RSA-1237-2013 was listed ed by this Court:- “It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondent(s) that the present appeals have been rendered infructuous as the concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the learned Courts below already stand executed long Since there is no representation on behalf of the of justice, adjourned to 22.5.2025. Registry to inform learned counsel for the appellant Photocopy of this order be placed in the file(s) of very outset, learned counsel appearing for the appellants through Video Conferencing on instructions submits that as defendants are in second appeal against the concurrent findings rendered by both the Courts below whereby the suit the last date of hearing i.e. 04.03.2025, when this case was listed “It is submitted by learned counsel for the been rendered infructuous as the concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the learned Courts below already stand executed long tion on behalf of the Registry to inform learned counsel for the appellant Photocopy of this order be placed in the file(s) of very outset, learned counsel appearing for the as RISHU KATARIA 2025.05.23 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-1246- noted in the previous order dated 04.03.2025 reproduced above, concurrent already bee second appeal; and the same may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. of as having been rendered infrcutuous. 22.05.2025 rishu -2013 (O&M) -2- noted in the previous order dated 04.03.2025 reproduced above, judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below have en executed long ago. Therefore, second appeal; and the same may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. In view of the above, the present second appeal is s having been rendered infrcutuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. .05.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable noted in the previous order dated 04.03.2025 reproduced above, the passed by the Courts below have herefore, nothing survives in the present second appeal; and the same may be disposed of as having been rendered In view of the above, the present second appeal is disposed ending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No the passed by the Courts below have nothing survives in the present second appeal; and the same may be disposed of as having been rendered disposed RISHU KATARIA 2025.05.23 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.