Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83827 (KAR)

M/S VINAYAKA PULVERISERS v. SRI B K ASHOK KUMAR

CRL.RP/1287/2021 · 2025-12-05

Ravi V Hosmani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51511 CRL.RP No. 1287 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1287 OF 2021 BETWEEN: 1. M/S. VINAYAKA PULVERISERS NO.19, 1 ST CROSS, 2ND MAIN, AZIZ SAIT AREA, NAYANDAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 039. REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI. NARASE GOWDA 2. SRI. NARASE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.8, 8TH CROSS, GANAPATHI NAGAR HOSAKEREHALLI NEW EXTN., BENGALURU - 560 026. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NATARAJU T, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: SRI. B.K. ASHOK KUMAR S/O LATE B.L. KAMALRAJ SHETTY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.1/116, 2ND FLOOR 5TH MAIN, NEAR KEMPEGOWDA LAYOUT BSK 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. CHETHAN A.C, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51511 CRL.RP No. 1287 of 2021 28.01.2020, PASSED BY THE LVI ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN CRL.A.NO.555/2019 AND THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 14.02.2018 PASSED IN C.C.NO.681/2018 ON THE FILE OF 12TH ADDITIONAL AND XXXVII A.C.M.M., BY DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT OF THE RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER None appears for petitioner and respondent. Even on previous date there was no appearance for petitioners and matter was adjourned with clarification that in case of further non-appearance, appropriate orders would be passed. Despite same, there is no appearance. This would indicate that petitioners are not diligent in pursuing Revision Petition. Therefore, Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 2. In view of disposal of petition, pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34 CT: BHK