- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35456 WP No. 25572 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 25572 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MR. NAVEEN KUMAR VISHWANATH S/O SRI L.VISWANATH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS SOLE PROPRIETOR OF NAGSAR INFO TEC. OFFICE AT NO.23, 1ST MAIN ROAD SRIKANTA LAYOUT HIGH GROUND BENGALURU – 560 001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI GAURAV G. K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SIRENA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., NO.34/1, 8TH FLOOR SAKTI STATESMAN BUILDING 7TH MAIN, IBLUR GREEN GLEN LAYOUT BELLANDUR OUTER RING ROAD BENGALURU – 560 103 A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35456 WP No. 25572 of 2025 2. SIRENA LABS PVT. LTD., OFFICE AT NO.301/34/1-9 IBBALUR BEGUR HOBLI BENGALURU – 560 102 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING COMMERCIAL COURT LXXXVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE BENGALURU CITY IN COM.OS.NO.432/*2021 TO PASS JUDGEMENT AND ORDERS IN IA NO. 30 WITHIN PERIOD OF 2 WEEKS (ANNEXURE-A)(ANNEXURE-F). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer: “a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Commercial Court LXXXVIII Addl. City Civil & Session Judge Bengaluru city in Com.O.S.No.432/*2021 to pass Judgement and Orders in I.A.No.30 within period of 2 weeks (Annexure – A) (Annexure – F); b) Pass any other order plus direction that the Hon’ble Court may deem fit under facts and circumstances of the case in interest of Justice and Equity.” * Corrected vide court order dated 18.09.2025 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35456 WP No. 25572 of 2025 2. The petitioner is the plaintiff, institutes a suit in Commercial O.S.No.432/*2021. The dates and events narrated by the petitioner is as follows: 3. Sri Gaurav G.K., learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter was posted for its judgment first time on 10.01.2025 and has been posted on umpteen number of times for its judgment, but the judgment is not delivered. He would submit that though the clarification sought by the concerned Court is clarified and the arguments are concluded, the judgment has not been delivered. * Corrected vide court order dated 18.09.2025 - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35456 WP No. 25572 of 2025 4. In that light, the concerned Court, if it has not concluded its so called clarification, shall deliver its judgment within an outer limit of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, if not earlier and if not delivered as on today. 5. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 82 CT:SS