- HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH AND SRI. MAHESH SHETTY, MEMBER REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.76/2020 (Lok Adalat No.8023/2025 ) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O LATE VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 2. SRI. MANJUNATH S/O LATE K.R. VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO.87 2ND MAIN, 6TH CROSS MARUTHINAGARA YELAHANKA, BENGALURU -560 063. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. KIRAN KUMAR T.L., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. B. SHANTHALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE B.R. RADHAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS. 2. SRI. B.R. VISHWESWARA S/O LATE B.R. RADHAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS - BOTH ARE R/AT NO.486, 2ND CROSS 2ND BLOCK, BANASHANKARI 1ST STAGE BENGALURU -560 050. 3. SRI. LAKSHMAN S/O LATE VENKATASWAMY AGED: MAJOR R/AT NO.87, 2ND MAIN, 6TH CROSS MARUTHINAGARA, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560063. 4. SRI. RAMESH S/O LATE VENKATASWAMY AGED: MAJOR R/AT NO.87, 2ND MAIN, 6TH CROSS MARUTHINAGARA, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560063. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.L. VISHWANATH AND SMT. MANASA M.B., ADVOCATES FOR R1 AND R2) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 READ WITH ORDER XLII OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 30.10.2019 PASSED IN R.A.NO.205/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.07.2011 PASSED IN O.S.NO.77/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL II CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.), BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU. THIS RSA COMING BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT TODAY, ON BEING REFERRED BY THE COURT, E.S.INDIRESH J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:- - CONCILIATION ORDER 1. Both side parties along with respective learned counsel are present and submit that, they have settled the matter as per the Compromise Petition dated 13.09.2025. 2. The parties submit that they have settled the matter in terms of the compromise petition, filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with S.151 of CPC. The said Compromise Petition is signed by all the parties and their learned counsel. Accordingly, the joint memo dated 13.09.2025 is hereby accepted. 3. The Regular Second Appeal No.76/2020 is accordingly disposed of, in terms of the Compromise Petition dated 13.09.2025. 4. Registry is directed to refund admissible court fee to the appellant/s, after due identification. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER sac