Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 114
RSA-1165-2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.04.2025 KARNAIL SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LR .... Appellant V/S ONKAR SINGH AND ORS ... Respondents 114-2 RSA-3410-2012 (O&M) BHUPINDER SINGH & ANR .... Appellants V/S ONKAR SINGH & ORS .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellant in RSA-1165-2012. Mr. Arun Singla, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2 in both cases. Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate for respondents No. 3 to 5 in RSA-1165-2012 and for the appellants in RSA-3410-2012. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) CM-3110-C-2012 in
RSA-1165-2012
1. For the reasons given in the application, it is allowed.
2. Delay of 1 day in filing of the appeal is condoned. Pooja Saini 2025.04.07 10:54 I attest the integrity and accuracy of this order/judgment
CM-9111-C-2012 in RSA-3410-2012
3. For the reasons given in the application, it is allowed.
4. Delay of 129 days in re-filing of the appeal is condoned. Main case.
5. This order shall dispose of the above-noted two appeals.
6. For the sake of convenience, factual position is being taken from RSA No. 1165 of 2012, titled as "Karnail Singh (since deceased) through LR versus Onkar Singh and others".
7. Appellant/defendant No.1 is in second appeal before this Court assailing concurrent findings recorded by the courts below.
8. Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, counsel for the appellant states that during the pendency of the appeal dispute has been amicably settled between the parties and the compromise deed dated 16.03.2024 has been drawn. Mr. Arun Singla, counsel representing contesting respondents No. 1 and 2 as well as Mr. Naveen Batra, counsel for proforma respondents No. 3 to 5 have admitted the factum of settlement and have requested that the appeal may be allowed in terms of compromise.
9. Accordingly, appeals are allowed. Judgments and decrees passed by both the courts below are set aside. Compromise deed dated 16.03.2024 is made a part of the decree. 03.04.2025
(SUVIR SEHGAL) pooja saini JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Pooja Saini 2025.04.07 10:54 I attest the integrity and accuracy of this order/judgment