Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83793 (KAR)

SMT MANGALAGOWRI v. MOHASEENA KHANAM

MFA/6913/2023 · 2025-12-13

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K & SMT.NALINA K. MEMBER M.F.A.No.6913/2023 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.8474/2025) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MANGALAGOWRI W/O. LATE K.M.MAHESH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 2. KUM.K.M.NISHA D/O. LATE K.M.MAHESH, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, 3. MASTER K.M.DARSHANAGOWDA S/O. LATE K.M.MAHESH AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS, (APPELLANT NO.3 IS THE MINOR REPTD., BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN & MOTHER SMT.MANGALAGOWRI) ALL ARE R/AT MARIGUDI ROAD K.M.DODDI VILLAGE AND POST BHARATHINAGARA 2 MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT. 4. SMT. PUTTATHAYAMMA W/O. LATE MANCHEGOWDA AGE : MAJOR, R/AT KUNDURU VILLAGE B.G.PURA HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI.RAJU S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MOHASEENA KHANAM D/O ABDUL MUJEED AGE: MAJOR R/AT NAGAVALLI VILLAGE & POST HEBBURU HOBLI TUMKUR TALUK & DISTRICT PRESENTLY R/AT KUDURU VILLAGE & POST MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA - 572 159. 2. THE MANAGER HDFC ERGO INSURANCE CO., LTD., NO.25/1, 2ND FLOOR, BUILDING - 2, SHANKARANARAYANA BUILDING NO.1 M.G.ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 19.06.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO.171/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM., AND ADDITIONAL MACT, RAMANAGARA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE 3 CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is present through video conferencing/physical hearing. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent- Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of 4 award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellants / claimants, on proper identification. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER GPG