Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50537-DB WP No. 33765 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 33765 OF 2025 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY.
M.S BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560001.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-560001
3.
THE DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION (ADMINISTRATION), DEPARTMERIT OF SCTIOOL EDUCATION, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-560001.
4.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, DAVANAGERE-577002.
Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50537-DB WP No. 33765 of 2025
5.
THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER.
CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANAGERE-577213.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIKAS ROJIPURA, AGA) AND:
SHALINI L D/O SRI LOKAPPA, W/O SRI CHANDAN S.N.
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, RESIDING AT JANANI NILAYA.
MAIN ROAD, HODIGERE POST, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANAGERE -577215.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA G GAYATRI., ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN APPLICATION NO.4492/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU;
ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION TO QUASH THE
ORDER DATED 29/11/2024 IN
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50537-DB WP No. 33765 of 2025
APPLICATION NO.4492/2024 PASSED BY THE HONBLE KSAT, BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD)
The respondent has successfully challenged the third petitioner's
order and the consequential Endorsement refusing compassionate appointment with the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru [for short, 'the Tribunal'] in Application No.4492/2024. The Tribunal has quashed the aforesaid orders but it has directed the petitioners to reconsider the respondent's claim for appointment on compassionate grounds.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50537-DB WP No. 33765 of 2025
Mr. Raghavendra G. Gayathri, the learned counsel for the respondent, submits that after the Tribunal's impugned order, the respondent is issued with another Endorsement dated 23.07.2025 and that the respondent has called in question such endorsement in Application No.4809/2025 with the Tribunal. Mr. Vikas Rojipura, the learned Additional Government Advocate, submits that the petition could indeed be disposed of, but without prejudice to the petitioners on the ground that the Tribunal's impugned order has not been called in question or that the petition is disposed of without interference.
This Court opines that the Tribunal is yet seized of the reasons assigned by the petitioners for rejection of the respondent's application, and therefore, the petition must be disposed of without prejudice to the petitioners leaving open all questions to be decided.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50537-DB WP No. 33765 of 2025
The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
RB