IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83191 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-239 Year-2024 Thana- CHHATAPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Guddu Kumar S/o Mukesh Yadav Resident of Village - Datua (Ward No.10), P.S.- Jadia, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 04-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 329(4), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109(1), 127(2), 103(1), 305(a) of BNSS and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with 21 other persons being armed with weapon were assaulting Pramod Yadav. It is further alleged that Ramesh Yadav and Kameshwar Yadav fired at Pramod Yadav which hit in his left hand. Ram Kumar Yadav, the brother-in-law of Pramod Yadav came to rescue then Arvind Yadav fired at the temple of Ram Kumar Yadav who fell down and later on died. It is further alleged that all the accused persons entered in the house of Pramod Yadav and took away valuables worth two lakh rupees. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83191 of 2024(3) dt.04-02-2025 2/2 has submitted that from perusal of the FIR it is clear that the petitioner is only arrayed as accused but there is no allegation of any specific overt act. The allegation is against Mukesh yadav, Kameshwar Yadav and Arvind Yadav. The petitioner is a man of clean antecedent. He is in custody since 24.07.2024. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No. 239 of 2024. 7. Accordingly, the present bail application stands allowed. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T