Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8377 (UTT)

VIJAY LAXMI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/919/2023 · 2025-06-30

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPSS No.919 of 2023 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the transfer was made in the earlier session and this writ petition has rendered infructuous. This statement is not disputed by the learned State Counsel. The writ petition has rendered infructuous. It stands disposed of accordingly. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 30.06.2025 Ravi