Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8377 (JHR)

GORANGO BAURI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.Rev./274/2024 · 2025-09-19

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:28871 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 274 of 2024 Gorango Bauri, aged about 43 years, son of late Madan Bauri, resident of village Kura, P.O. Kura, P.S. Pindrajora, District-Bokaro ...... … Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Dipak Ojha @ Deepak Ojha, son of Shitkanth Ojha, Kura @ Resident of Village Birtand, Ojhadih @ Girdhartand, P.O. Kura, P.S. Pindrajora, District Bokaro; 3. Devashish Ojha, son of Dipak Ojha @ Deepak Ojha, Resident of Village Birtand, Kura @ Ojhadih @ Girdhartand, P.O. Kura, P.S. Pindrajora, District Bokaro; 4. Vijay Ojha @ Bijay Ojha, , son of Dipak Ojha @ Deepak Ojha, Resident of Village Birtand, Kura @ Ojhadih @ Girdhartand, P.O. Kura, P.S. Pindrajora, District Bokaro:, Dhurv Lef Ojha 5. Dhruv Lal Ojha @ Dhurv Lal Ojha, son of Shitkanth Ojha, Resident of Village Birtand, P.O. Kura, P.S. Pindrajora, District Bokaro; 6. Chandi Ojha, son of Kalyani Ojha, Resident of Village Birtand, P.O.-Kura, P.S. Pindrajora, District, Bokaro; 7. Raju Ojha, son of Late Ajit Ojha, resident of Ojhadih (Kurma), P.O. -Kura, P.S. Pindrajora, District-Bokaro .…. … Opposite Parties -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Nishant Kr. Roy, For the State : Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, Spl. P.P. For the O.P. Nos. 3, 4, 5 & 7 :Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate 11/ 19.09.2025: The present revision application has been filed challenging the legality, propriety and correctness of part of the order dated 08.02.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge (SC/ST), Bokaro in Protest-cum-Complaint Case No. 1054 of 2023, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has become infructuous as the complaint petition has been dismissed. He seeks permission to withdraw this petition. 3. Learned counsels for the State and O.P. Nos. 3, 4, 5 & 7 have got no objection. 4. Accordingly, this revision application is dismissed as infructuous. Pending I.A, if any, stands disposed of. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi- Dt. 19.09.2025