Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8376 (JHR)

SOHRAI YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2081/2025 · 2025-03-28

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.2081 of 2025 ------ Sohrai Yadav, aged about 48 years, son of Bigan Yadav, resident of Vill-Dad Tuta, P.O. Munkeri, P.S.-Chhatarpur, Dist.-Palamu, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 28/03/2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Chhatarpur P.S. Case No.204 of 2024 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109, 74, 303(2), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, being a member of an unlawful assembly, in prosecution of common object of the assembly attempted to murder the informant and her brother-in-law and outraged the modesty of the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-12 of this anticipatory bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not go over the place of occurrence land; as the petitioner has no concern with the said land and he will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Palamu in connection with Chhatarpur P.S. Case No.204 of 2024 with the condition that he will co- operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and will not go to or over the place of occurrence land and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/