Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8374 (AP)

MATTAPARTHI VENKATRAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/4778/2025 · 2025-02-24

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010089782025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 4778/2025 Between: 1. MATTAPARTHI VENKATRAO, S/O. MATTAPARTHI VENKATRAO AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE COOLI R/O. H.NO.1- 108, PANGIDIGUDEM VILLAGE, JANGAREDDIGUDEM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, A.P. 2. ANDUGULA VENKATESWAR RAO, S/O. ANDUGULA GANGARAJU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE COOLI R/O. PANGIDIGUDEM VILLAGE, JANGAREDDIGUDEM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, A.P. 3. GOLIME YESU, S/O. GOLIME SHESHAYYA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE COOLI R/O. H.NO.5-80, KOTTAPETA, PANGIDIGUDEM, JANGAREDDIGUDEM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, A.P. 4. LAKKABATTULA VENKATESWAR RAO, S/O. LAKKABATTULA AMAJI AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE COOLI R/O. H.NO.3- 10, PANGIDIGUDEM VILLAGE, JANGAREDDIGUDEM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCILPAL, SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, A.P. 2 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU DISTRICT, ELURU, A.P. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT, A.P. 4. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, JANGAREDDIGUDEM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NAMBURI SURYA VENKATA MAHARSHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri Ghanta Rama Rao, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Namburi Surya Venkata Maharshi, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners seeks to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition on the ground that several mistakes have inadvertently crept into the averments in the Affidavit as well as the Writ Petition. 2. Request granted. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh Writ Petition. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 24.02.2025 DSV