Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83732 (PNJ)

SARITA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/8043/2025 · 2025-07-25

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-8043-2025 135 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Sarita and another State of Haryana CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present:- Ms. Shruti Sharma for the petitioners. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL) This Criminal Writ Petition under of India for issuance of d liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents not to harass the petitioners. Notice of motion. On the aski accepts notice on behalf of the respondent necessary action will be taken on the representation dated P-5) after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, by passing a speaking order within a period of three days from today, No.12/252/2023 Government of Haryana. In light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the instant petition any further. 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Date of Decision : and another Versus Haryana and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Ms. Shruti Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. ..… SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL) This Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution for issuance of direction to official respondent No liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents not to harass the Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State, who assures the Court that necessary action will be taken on the representation dated ) after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, by passing a speaking order within a period of three days from today, No.12/252/2023-4HG-IV dated 17.02.2025 issued by the Home Department, Government of Haryana. In light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the instant petition any further. -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8043-2025 Date of Decision : 25.07.2025 ….Petitioners. ....Respondents. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Articles 226/227 of the Constitution ction to official respondent No.2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents not to harass the Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl A.G., Haryana State, who assures the Court that necessary action will be taken on the representation dated 22.07.2025 (Annexure ) after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, by passing a speaking order within a period of three days from today, in the light of notification IV dated 17.02.2025 issued by the Home Department, In light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want Articles 226/227 of the Constitution to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents not to harass the , Addl A.G., Haryana State, who assures the Court that (Annexure ) after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, by passing a in the light of notification IV dated 17.02.2025 issued by the Home Department, In light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want TRIPTI SAINI 2025.07.25 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8043-2025 The present petition stands dismissed as not pressed. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to file appeal, as is stipulated in the Standard Operating Procedure as per law, in case of any grievance left after passing of the speaking order. July 25, 2025 tripti Whether speaking/non Whether reportable 2025 The present petition stands dismissed as not pressed. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to file appeal, as is in the Standard Operating Procedure as per law, in case of any grievance left after passing of the speaking order. Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No -2- The present petition stands dismissed as not pressed. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to file appeal, as is in the Standard Operating Procedure as per law, in case of any grievance (SANDEEP MOUDGIL JUDGE speaking : Speaking : Yes/No However, the petitioners would be at liberty to file appeal, as is in the Standard Operating Procedure as per law, in case of any grievance SANDEEP MOUDGIL) TRIPTI SAINI 2025.07.25 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document