Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83722 (PAT)

Raj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/2686/2024 · 2025-03-18

A Abhishek Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2686 of 2024 ====================================================== Raj Kumar, Son of Late Bipat Mahto, Resident of Mohalla- Speaker Chowk Naya Tola, Ward No. 26, Post Office- G.P.O. Muzaffarpur, Police Station- Kazi Mohammadpur, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supply, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 4. The Collector, Muzaffarpur. 5. The Sub Divisional Officer, East Muzaffarpur. 6. The District Supply Officer, Muzaffarpur. 7. The Block Supply Officer, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mazharul Hassan, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Panakaj Kumar ( Sc 12) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 4 18-03-2025 Without going into the merits or demerits of the case, having regard to the fact that the petitioner has an alternative and effective remedy of filing a representation before the Principal Secretary, under Rule 32 (vii) of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 against the impugned order. The present writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the Principal Secretary challenging the order of the Revisional/Appellate Authority and order of cancellation withing a period of twelve weeks from today. On such Patna High Court CWJC No.2686 of 2024(4) dt.18-03-2025 2/2 representation being made, the Principal Secretary shall pass necessary orders strictly in accordance with law. 2. It is needless to mention that before passing any order the petitioner shall be put on notice and given an opportunity of hearing. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. Any order passed shall be communicated to the party. 3. With the above observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of. shakir/- (A. Abhishek Reddy, J) U