Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83720 (PNJ)

GAGANDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/8041/2025 · 2025-07-25

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-8041-2025 134 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Gagandeep Singh and another State of Punjab and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present:- Mr. A.S. Gulati, Advocate, for the petitioners. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL) This Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the of India for issuance of direction to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents not to harass the petitioners. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, notice on behalf of the respondent action will be taken on the representation dated 23.07.2025 (Annexure P providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, by passing a spe within a period of three days from today, No.HOMEHM- Department of Home Affairs, Punjab, Government of Punjab (Home In light of the above, learned to press the instant petition any further. 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Date of Decision : Gagandeep Singh and another Versus State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Mr. A.S. Gulati, Advocate, for the petitioners. ..… SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL) This Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the of India for issuance of direction to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents not to harass the Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. J.S. Rat notice on behalf of the respondent-State, who assures the Court that necessary action will be taken on the representation dated 23.07.2025 (Annexure P providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, by passing a spe within a period of three days from today, -40 40SECM/14/2025-2H4/63 dated 23.01.2025 issued by the Department of Home Affairs, Punjab, Government of Punjab (Home In light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the instant petition any further. -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8041-2025 Date of Decision : 25.07.2025 ….Petitioners. ....Respondents. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL This Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents not to harass the Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab accepts State, who assures the Court that necessary action will be taken on the representation dated 23.07.2025 (Annexure P-5) after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, by passing a speaking order within a period of three days from today, in the light of notification 2H4/63 dated 23.01.2025 issued by the Department of Home Affairs, Punjab, Government of Punjab (Home-4 Branch). counsel for the petitioners does not want Constitution of India for issuance of direction to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents not to harass the accepts State, who assures the Court that necessary 5) after aking order in the light of notification 2H4/63 dated 23.01.2025 issued by the 4 Branch). counsel for the petitioners does not want TRIPTI SAINI 2025.07.25 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8041-2025 The present petition stands dismissed as not pressed. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to file appeal, as is stipulated in the Standard Operating Procedu left after passing of the speaking order. July 25, 2025 tripti Whether speaking/non Whether reportable 2025 The present petition stands dismissed as not pressed. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to file appeal, as is stipulated in the Standard Operating Procedure as per law, in case of any grievance left after passing of the speaking order. Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No -2- The present petition stands dismissed as not pressed. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to file appeal, as is re as per law, in case of any grievance (SANDEEP MOUDGIL JUDGE speaking : Speaking : Yes/No However, the petitioners would be at liberty to file appeal, as is re as per law, in case of any grievance SANDEEP MOUDGIL) TRIPTI SAINI 2025.07.25 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document