139 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CR-4835-2025 Date of decision : 28.07.2025 Naini Jain ... Petitioner Versus Naveen Rathi and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr.Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 08.11.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Civil Judge (Jr.Div.), Rohtak, vide which the application dated 07.07.2022 (Annexure P-3) filed by the defendant no.3- petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of plaint has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since the petitioner is yet to file written statement, thus, he prays that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all the pleas, which are available to the petitioner including the plea of limitation, inadequate court fee in the written statement and during the course of trial. 3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE July 28, 2025. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Davinder Kumar 2025.07.29 16:44 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment