1 2025:CGHC:24004 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1241 of 2020 1 - Ashok Kumar Chandrakar S/o Shri S.P. Chandrakar Aged About 56 Years Principal Government Higher Secondary School Chhindpur Block Katghora, P.S. - Haldi Bazar, District - Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Secretary Department Of Tribal Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Commissioner Tribal Welfare C.G. Government Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Director Public Instruction C.G. Government Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, Adv. For Respondents : Mr. Amandeep Singh, Panel Lawyer. (Hon’ble Mr. Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, J) Order on Board 13/06/2025 1. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs :- “i. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a suitable writ or writs for directing the respondents to give the arrears of difference of amount to the petitioner between 2000 to June 2007 along with interest and repay fixation of the petitioner salary. Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2025.06.16 18:42:00 +0530 2 ii. Any other relief/reliefs which may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be allowed.” 2. After arguing for some times, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, he wants to raise his grievance by making a representation before the respondent authorities for redressal of his grievance. Therefore, He prays that, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with the liberty to file representation before the respondent authorities. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that, they have no objection to allow the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Having considered the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the same is allowed and this petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioner, as prayed for. If the petitioner submits representation raising his grievance, as raised in this petition, within a period of 15 days from today, before the respondent authorities, then they are directed to consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within a period of 90 days from the date of filing of the representation. 5. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Pathak