Smt. Boya Lakshmamma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/5287/2020 · 2025-08-27
B Krishna Mohan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8369 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8369 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010089362020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 5287 OF 2020 Between;
1. Smt. Boya Lakshmamma, W/o. Late Pedda Ankanna, Aged about 80 R/o. Mittakandala Village, Pamulapadu years, Occ: House Wife, Mandal, Kurnool District, A.P.
2. Boya Ranganna, S/o. Pedda Ankanna, Aged 60 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o. Mittakandala Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Kurnool Labour, District, A.P.
3. Smt. Boya Guramma, W/o. Late Chinna Ankanna, Aged about 65 years, Occ: House Wife, R/o. Mittakandala Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Kurnool District, A.P. ...Petitioners AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The District Collector, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kurnool Division, Kurnool District. 4. The Tahasildar, Pamulapadu Mandal, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 5. The Village Revenue Officer, Mittakandala Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Kurnool, Kurnool District. ...Respondents
* Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circums^tances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issued a direction, order or Writ more particularly on in the nature oKWrit of Mandamus declaring the highhanded action of the official respondents in dispossessing us from our lands in Survey No. 580/1, in an extent of Ac. 5.74 cents in Mittakandala Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Kurnool District, is illegal, arbitrary and intentional and in violation of Art. 14, 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India and also in utter violation of the principles of natural justice without giving any notice under Sec. 7 of the Revenue Laws (Madras Act) and consequently direct the official respondents not to dispossess us from our lands in Survey No. 580/1, in an extent of Ac. 5.74 cents in Mittakandala Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Kurnool District. i lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess us from our lands in Survey No. 580/1, in an extent of Ac. 5.74 cents in Mittakandala Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Kurnool District.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI G. ELISHA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order:
APHCOI 0089362020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 5287/2020 Between;
1 SMT BOYA LAKSHMAMMA, , W/0. LATE PEDDA ANKANNA, AGED R/0. MITTAKANDALA ABOUT 80 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, VILLAGE, PAMULAPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P 2.BOYA RANGANNA, , S/0. PEDDA ANKANNA, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE LABOUR PAMULAPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P.
3 SMT BOYA GURAMMA, , W/0. LATE CHINNA ANKANNA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/0. MITTAKANDALA VILLAGE, PAMULAPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER(S) R/0. MITTAKANDALA VILLAGE, AND state of ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARIAT 1.THE SECRETARY, BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. REVENUE DEPARTMENT, 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. KURNOOL DIVISION, 3.THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4.THE TAHASILDAR, PAMULAPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, MITTAKANDALA VILLAGE 5.THE PAMULAPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2 bk W.P.NO.5287OF202O ...RESPONDENT{S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issued a direction, order or Writ more particularly on in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the highhanded action of the official respondents in dispossessing us from our lands in Survey No. 580/1, in an extent of Ac. 5.74 cents in Mittakandala Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Kurnool District, is illegal, arbitrary and intentional and in violation of Art. 14, 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India and also in utter violation of the principles of natural justice without giving any notice under Sec. 7 of the Revenue Laws (Madras Act) and consequently direct the official respondents not to dispossess us from our lands in Survey No. 580/1, in an extent of Ac.
5.74 cents in Mittakandala Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Kurnool District, and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess us from our lands in Survey No. 580/1, in an extent of Ac. 5.74 cents in Mittakandala Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Kurnool District, Counsel for the Petitioner(S);
1.G ELISHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following;
3 BKIVi,J \A/.P.N0.5287 0F2020
ORDER:- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.
2. This Writ Petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in dispossessing the petitioners from the lands in Sy.No.580/1 to an extent of Ac.5-74 cents in Mittakandala Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Kurnool District, without giving any notice under Section 7 of Revenue Laws(Madras Act). On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government appearing for the respondents submits that the said Madras Act is not in force, if so warranted, the respondent authorities concerned would follow the due procedure in respect of the said land.
3. Pleader
4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 5 are directed to deal with the subject property in an extent of Ac. 5- 74 cents in Sy.No.580/1 of Mittakandala Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Kurnool District, strictly in accordance with law.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim
order, if deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. any. As a sequel. Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY// Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY GiSTRAR / SECTION OFFICER To, 1- The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.
2. The District Collector, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kurnool Division, Kurnool District.
4. The Tahasildar, Pamulapadu Mandal, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
5. The Village Revenue Officer, Mittakandala Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
6. One CC to Sri G. Elisha, Advocate [OPUC]
7. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
8. Two CD Copies Cnr
■K':.
HIGH COURT DATED:28/08/2025
ORDER WP NO. 5287 OF 2020 IS SEP 2025 ^ ^Qurrent O' DISPOSING OF THE W.P.
WITHOUT COSTS