- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29491 WP No. 19922 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 19922 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. SIDDAGANGAIAH SON OF LATE BYLAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, RESIDING NO.548, 2ND B MAIN ROAD, 2ND STAGE, NAGARBHAVI 11TH BLOCK, BANGALORE - 560 072 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVI H.K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001 2. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER NO.49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOORS, EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001 Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29491 WP No. 19922 of 2025 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER - 1, BMICP, KIADB OFFICE, NO.14/3, ARAVIND BHAVAN, 1ST FLOOR, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.L. PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 29.05.2025 BEARING NO. CI 43 SPQ 2024 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 VIDE ANNEXURE-G BY ISSUING A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. 2. The memo reads as follows: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The petitioner most respectfully submits that earlier in the village of the petitioner there was a gathering amongst the aggrieved persons in respect of the impugned acquisition proceedings including the petitioner and, in the process, the petitioner has become a part of the W.P.No.18553/2025 (LA-KIADB) filed by 47 persons. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29491 WP No. 19922 of 2025 Being not fully aware that his grievances are covered in the said Writ petition coupled with anxiety and apprehension of losing his land, the petitioner filed the instant writ petition believing that he must individually redress his grievances citing grounds specific to his case to save his land. The petitioner in realisation of the same deeply regrets the same and highly is apologetic about the same. The same is Bonafide and unintentional. In the circumstances, the petitioner would pursue the W.P.No.18553/2025(LA-KIADB) and seeks to withdraw the instant petition. Hence, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dispose of this writ petition as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity.” In terms of the memo, the writ petition is disposed as withdrawn. SD/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 97