Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83676 (PAT)

Nathuni yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. APP (SJ)/5302/2024 · 2025-07-08

Nawneet Kumar Pandey

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.5302 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2023 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== Nathuni yadav S/o Narayan yadav @ Nayan Yadav R/o vill - Khap, P.S. - Lokaha, Distt.- Madhubani ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar 2. Danwati Devi D/o Bangali Ram, W/o Kushum Lal Ram R/o vill - Arnama, P.s. - Lokaha, Distt.- Madhubani ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Binay Krishna, Spl.PP For O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 8 08-07-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This appeal has been preferred against the cognizance order dated 31.7.2024, passed by Learned Addl. Session Judge 1st cum Special Judge, Madhubani, in connection with Complaint Case No-106/2023, District- Madhubani, whereby cognizance has been taken under Sections 341, 323, 354 (B), 379 of the IPC & 3 (1) (r)(s)/3 (2) (va) of the SC/ST (POA) Act. 3. While assailing the order taking cognizance against the appellant, the learned counsel for the appellant has Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.5302 of 2024(8) dt.08-07-2025 2/2 submitted that the allegation is false and frivolous on the face of record itself. The complainant, in her complaint petition, made allegation that Nathuni Yadav (the petitioner) entered into a neighbouring house of the complainant and misbehaved with the female members of that house. While in her statement, she has stated that Laxmi Yadav entered her house and outraged her modesty. 4. The allegation is unbelievable. 5. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the cognizance order dated 31.07.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 1st cum Special Judge, Madhubani in Complaint Case No. 106 of 2023 is hereby quashed and the appeal is allowed. kundan/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T