Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8367 (UTT)

KARTIKAY SHARMA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1126/2025 · 2025-07-02

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:5598 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/1126/2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Karan Anand, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. V.S. Pal, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Present applicant- Kartikay Sharma, S/o Rajesh Sharma is praying for regular bail in relation to FIR dated 25.03.2025, bearing FIR/Case Crime No. 58 of 2025 registered at P.S. Premngar District Dehradun by which seven persons were implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 191(2), 191(3), 351(3) and 352 of BNS 2023. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated which is evident from the fact that the applicant is not named in the FIR and submits that he has been implicated during course of investigation only on the disclosure of his name by the other co-accused. He further submits that in this case charge sheet has already been filed and, as such, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation of the present applicant. Apart from this, he submits that the applicant is the student ,pursuing his study in B.C.A from University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun and has no criminal history. Apart from this he submits that other co-accused have already been granted bail by this Court on 20.06.2025 in BA1 No. 1079 of 2025 and BA1 No. 1082 of 2025. 5. On the other side, Mr. V.S. Pal, learned A.G.A. for the State has not disputed this fact that charge sheet has 2025:UHC:5598 already been filed and, as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant, and furthermore the applicant has no previous criminal history. 6. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that charge sheet has already been filed and there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant, and furthermore, other co- accused have already been granted bail by this Court, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant Kartikay Sharma be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 02.07.2025 Parul 2025:UHC:5598