- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3268 WP No. 107575 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO.107575 OF 2024 (CS-EL/M) BETWEEN: 1. ITTAPPA S/O. GULAPPA GADADINNI AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: NAGARAL, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT SL. NO.04. 2. SIDDALINGAYYA S/O. BASAYYA LANGATAD AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: NAGARAL, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT SL. NO.05 3. MALAKAJEPPA S/O. PANDAPPA SONNAD AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: NAGARAL, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT SL. NO.08 4. SANGAPPA S/O. PANDAPPA SONNAD AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: NAGARAL, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT SL. NO. 09 5. HANUMANTH S/O. SHIVAPPA SUNAGAR AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT SL. NO.14 VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.02.19 10:32:37 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3268 WP No. 107575 of 2024 6. HUCCHAPPA S/O. SIDDAPPA KARABANI AGE: 66 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT SL. NO.15 7. VITTAL S/O. PADIYAPPA TAKKI AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT SL. NO.16 8. MOTILAL S/O. KEMU LAMANI AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT SL. NO.20 9. SANGAPPA S/O. AYYAPPA KUMBARA AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI DIST: BAGALKOT SL. NO.21 10. LAXMAPPA S/O. SHIVAPPA SUNAGAR AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI DIST: BAGALKOT, SL. NO.22. 11. LALASAB S/O. GAIBHUSAB PAKALI AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT SL. NO.25. 12. SAIDUSAB S/O. HASANASAB PAKALI AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT SL. NO.26. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3268 WP No. 107575 of 2024 13. SHANKREPPA S/O. SOMAPPA AMMAJAJARI AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT, SL. NO.29. 14. PADIYAPPA S/O. RAMAPPA KOGATI AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT, SL. NO.32. 15. BASAVARAJA S/O. HUCCHAPPA DALAWAI AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT, SL. NO.33. 16. RANGAPPA S/O. HANAMAPPA JAGGALA AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT, SL. NO.34. 17. KRISHNA S/O. KASHEPPA LAMANI AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT, SL. NO.35. 18. MUDAKAPPA S/O. HANAMAPPA JAGGALA AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT, SL. NO.39. 19. PADIYAPPA S/O. BALAPPA DALAWAI AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3268 WP No. 107575 of 2024 R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT, SL. NO.41. 20. JYOTI W/O: MALLESHI LAMANI AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT, SL. NO.42. 21. MALLESHI S /O. KEMU LAMANI AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT. 22.VITTAL HANUMANTH DODDAMANI AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI SHIVAKUMAR S. BADAWADAGI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO- OPERATION, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU – 580 001. 2. THE STATE CO- OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY, 3RD FLOOR, A BLOCK SHANTI NAGAR, T. T. M. C. BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 002, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ELETION OFFICER, THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES , BAGALKOT REGION AND ABOVE TALUKA LAVE AND BELOW DISTRICT LEVEL - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3268 WP No. 107575 of 2024 AREA OPERATION OF ALL PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BAGALKOT, TALUK: BAGALKOT, DIST: BAGALKOT, PIN:587 101. 4. THE RETURNING OFICER, THE BILAGI TALUKA PRATHAMIK SAHAKARI KRUSHI MATTU GRAMEEN ABURVADDI BANK NIYAMIT BILAGI, AND THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES JAMKHANDI SUB-DIVISION JAMKHANDI TALUK: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT, PIN:587 301. 5. THE BILAGI TALUKA PRATHAMIK SAHAKARI KRUSHI MATTU GRAMEEN ABIRUADDI BANK NIYAMIT BILAGI TALUK: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE. PIN:587 116. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1 AND R3; SRI G.V.BHARAMAGOUDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS NO. 3 TO 5 TO INCLUDE THE NAMES OF THE PETITIONERS IN THE FINAL ELIGIBLE BORROWER VOTER LIST AND PERMIT THE PETITIONERS TO CAST VOTE IN THE ELECTION TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE MANAGEMENT OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT BANK SCHEDULED TO BE HELD ON 15/12/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-A THE COPY OF THE CALENDAR OF EVENTS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NO. 4 TO DECLARE THE ELECTION RESULTS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE ELECTION PROCESS BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3268 WP No. 107575 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the parties in unison would submit that, the issue in the lis stands covered by judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P. No.8502/2022 C/w. W.P. No.8477/2022, disposed off on 7th June 2022. The Coordinate Bench of this Court held as follows: “8. In the light of these rival submissions, the question for consideration is: Whether these writ petitions must be disposed of directing the Returning Officer [the fourth respondent and sixth respondents in the respective petitions to announce the results of the elections held on 23.04.2022 including the votes cast by the petitioners. 9. The provisions of Rule 13-D (2-A) of the Rules read as hereunder: (3) The Election Officer shall take steps for publication of voters list in the following manner, namely:- (a) for publication of draft eligible electoral list, a list of defaulters, a list of members whose repayment falls due, before the election date clear fifty days; (b) for calling objections, if any, calling upon the defaulter members to repay the amounts due to the co-operative societies on or before thirty clear days prior to the date of election; - 7 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3268 WP No. 107575 of 2024 (c) the scrutiny and verification of the voters list after payment by defaulters etc., clear twenty days before the ate of election. (d) for publication of final eligible voters list before fifteen clear days prior to the date of election. The underlining is by this Court. 10. These provisions do not leave any room for doubt that an excluded member, with the publication of the Draft Eligible Electoral List, must have an opportunity by way of an individual notice to file objections on exclusion from the Electoral List. It must be shown that the concerned Chief Executive has prepared and sent notice to the affected members. The Public Notice dated 8.11.20211 does not meet these requirements. In fact, it is admitted on behalf of the respondents that there are deficiencies in the preparation of the Final Electoral Roll after the publication of 1 This Public Notice reads as follows: ¸ÀAWÀzÀ ¨ÉʯÁ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: r Dgï ªÉÊ: Dgï.J¸ï.Dgï.JA.J.©.¹.Dgï- 16/2018- 19 ¢£ÁAPÀ 16.11.2018 gÀAvÉ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À G¥À¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ, ªÀÄAqÀå f¯Éè, ªÀÄAqÀågÀªÀgÀÄ ¨ÉʯÁ wzÀÄݪÀrAiÀÄ£ÀÄß D£ÀĪÉÆâ¹ £ÉÆAzÁ¬Ä¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. CzÀgÀAvÉ '©' vÀgÀUÀw gÉÊvÀ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ µÉÃj£À ªÀÄÄR¨É¯É gÀÆ.1000.00 UÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ µÉÃgÀÄ ±ÀÄ®ÌzÀ ¨Á§Ä gÀÆ.100.00 UÀ¼ÀÄ DVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ªÀiÁ£Àå '©' vÀgÀUÀw ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÁzÀ vÀªÀÄä µÉÃgÀÄ ªÉƧ®UÀÄ gÀÆ.500.00UÀ¼ÀÄ EzÀÄÝ ¨ÁQ µÉÃgÀÄ ªÉƧ®UÀÄ gÀÆ.500.00UÀ¼ÀÄ PÀrªÉÄ EgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. EzÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ ¨ÁQ EgÀĪÀ µÉÃgÀÄ ±ÀÄ®Ì gÀÆ.90.00UÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÉÃj MlÄÖ gÀÆ590,00UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÁªÀw¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ ªÀiÁ£Àå '©' vÀgÀUÀw PÉ®ªÀÅ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ µÉÃgÀÄ ªÉƧ®UÀÄ gÀÆ.100.00UÀ¼ÀÄ EzÀÄÝ. ¨ÁQ µÉÃgÀÄ ªÉƧ®UÀÄ gÀÆ900.00UÀ¼ÀÄ PÀrªÉÄ EgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. EzÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ ¨ÁQ EgÀĪÀ µÉÃgÀÄ ¸ÀÄ®Ì gÀÆ 100.00UÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÉÃj MlÄÖ gÀÆ 1000.00UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¢£ÁAPÀ:11.12.2021 gÉƼÀUÉ ¸ÀAWÀPÉÌ ¥ÁªÀw¸ÀĪÀAvÉ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ vÀªÀÄUÉ w½¹zÉ. ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀjzÀÄ EzÀ®èzÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À C¢ü¤AiÀÄ£ÀÄ 1959gÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt 20(2) (J4) ºÁUÀÆ (J5)gÀrAiÀÄ°è£À CªÀPÁ±ÀUÀ¼ÀAvÉAiÀÄÆ CºÀðvÉAiÀÄÆ ºÉÆA¢gÀ¨ÉÃPÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. vÀ¦àzÀ°è ªÀÄÄAzÉ d£ÀªÀj 2022gÀ ªÀiÁºÉAiÀÄ°è £ÀqÉAiÀÄ°gÀĪÀ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ° ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è ªÀÄvÀ ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ ¸Àà¢üð¸À®Ä CªÀPÁ±À«gÀĪÀÅ¢®è JA§ «µÀAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ vÀªÀÄUÉ w½¸À¯ÁVzÉ. - 8 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3268 WP No. 107575 of 2024 the Draft Eligible Electoral List, and the petitioners have not been issued with individual notices. 11. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami (Moingiri Maharaj) Sahakari Dugha Utpadak Sanstha and Another v. State of Maharashtra and Others supra has held as follows: ‘7. A perusal of the Rules discloses that the preparation of provisional list of voters, filing of objection against the provisional list of voters, consideration of the objection by the Collector and finalising the list of voters, all occur in the Rules which cover the entire process of the election. The Rules framed for election of specified societies are complete code in itself providing for the entire process of election beginning from the stage of preparation of the provisional voters list, decision on the objection by the Collector, finalisation of electoral rolls, holding of election and declaration of result of the election. In view of the scheme of the Act and Rules, the preparation of voters' list must be held to be part of the election process for constituting managing committee of a specified society. 12. In view of our finding that preparation of the electoral roll is being an intermediate stage in the process of election of the managing committee of a specified society and the election process having been set in motion, it is well settled that the High Court should not stay the continuation of the election process even though there may be some alleged illegality or breach of rules while preparing the electoral roll. It is not disputed that the election in question has already been held and the result thereof has been stayed by an order of this Court, and once the result of the election is declared, it would be open to the appellant to challenge the election of returned candidate, if aggrieved, by means of an election petition before the election tribunal. - 9 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3268 WP No. 107575 of 2024 12. It follows from this decision that the adjudication of all questions must be as provided under Section 70(2) of the Co-operative Societies Act2. However, in the present case the respondents admit that there are deficiencies in finalization of Final Electoral List. The petitioners are admittedly not issued with individual notice as required under the provisions of Rule13-D (2-A) of the Co-operative Societies Rules; the petitioners have now cast their votes in the elections on 23.04.2022; the petitioners are not given the opportunity to show cause against the allegations that they have created documents. The respondents, despite admitting deficiencies in finalisation of the Final Electoral List, want to invoke the rule of alternative remedy. This Court is of the considered view that, in the peculiarities of this case, the writ petitions should be disposed of with directions to the concerned respondent to announce results counting even the votes cast by the petitioners and with liberty to all the concerned to avail remedy under Section 70(2) of the Act if aggrieved by the results. If such remedy is availed 2 70. Disputes which may be referred to Registrar for decision.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, if any dispute touching the constitution, management, or the business of a co-operative society arises,— (a) xxxxxxxxx (2). For the purposes of sub-section (1), the following shall be deemed to be disputes touching the constitution, management or the business of a co-operative society, namely:— (a). XXXXXXXXXXX (b). XXXXXXXXXXXXX (c). any dispute arising in connection with the election of a President, Vice- president, Chairman, Vice-chairman, Secretary, Treasurer or Member of Committee of the society. - 10 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3268 WP No. 107575 of 2024 raising a dispute, exclusion of votes of those petitioners who are guilty of fraud can also be considered based on the material that will be placed on record. Therefore, writ petitions are disposed of calling upon the Returning Officer [the fourth respondent/sixth respondent in the respective petitions] to announce the result forthwith including the votes cast by the petitioners in both the petitions. All the contentions are left open for consideration in appropriate proceedings, if commenced.” 2. Learned counsel would submit that, if the same order is passed, it would suffice in this case also. 3. In that light, the writ petition is disposed calling upon the respondent – Returning Officer to announce the result forthwith including the votes cast by the petitioners. All the contentions are left open for consideration in appropriate proceedings, if commenced. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VNP/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 99