Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83664 (KAR)

MRS. NIRMALA A v. MR. MADESHA D

MFA/3135/2017 · 2025-10-10

Jayant Banerji, K V Aravind

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40026-DB MFA No. 3135 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3135 OF 2017 (FC) BETWEEN: MRS. NIRMALA.A, WIFE OF MADESHA.D, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, C/O KEMPEERAIAH, RESIDENT OF NES LAYOUT, KHB COLONY, 2ND MAIN ROAD, NEAR ANITHA CONVENT, MALAVALLI TOWN-571 430, MANDYA DISTRICT, …APPELLANT (APPELLANT-SMT.NIRMALA.A., ABSENT) AND: MR.MADESHA.D, SON OF DASA NAYAKA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDENT OF GADDEMOLE VILLAGE, VYASARAJAPURA POST, T.NARASIPURA TALUK-571 124, MYSURU DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.SHARATH GOWDA G B., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by K G RENUKAMBA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40026-DB MFA No. 3135 of 2017 THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19 (1) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.03.2017 IN M.C.NO. 69/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. PRL. FAMILY COURT AT MYSURU, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13 (1)(ia) OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) Pursuant to the previous order dated 04.08.2025 passed by this Court, the office had issued notice to the appellant to engage another counsel. However, the notice has been returned as 'unserved' with a noting that the appellant was residing in a tenanted premises which has been vacated by her some time back and her whereabouts are not known. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40026-DB MFA No. 3135 of 2017 2. In view of the aforesaid, it appears that the appellant is not interested to pursue the appeal. The appeal is therefore dismissed. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE TIN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18