Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8366 (PNJ)

DHARAMVEER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/30018/2025 · 2026-07-27

Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP No.30018 of 2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 103 CWP No.30018 of 2025 (O&M) Date of decision: July 27th, 2026 Dharamveer .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Vikram Singh and Mr. Harkirat Singh, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Ms. Amrita Nagpal, Advocate for Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.4. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a civil writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for setting aside/quashing of notification dated 10.01.2011 under Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and notification dated 17.08.2020 under Section 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that inadvertently, the petitioner has not challenged the award and thus, he seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after laying down challenge to the said award. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.07.28 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CWP No.30018 of 2025 (O&M) 2 4. It is made clear that in case any such petition is filed, the same would be considered independently in accordance with law. 5. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE July 27th, 2026 (SUBHAS MEHLA) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.07.28 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh