Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83658 (PAT)

Kumkum Kumari v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./82135/2024 · 2025-01-27

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82135 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-980 Year-2024 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Kumkum Kumari D/o Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Choudhary Resident Of Old Alamganj Chowki Near Kedarnath Math, Ps - Alamganj, Distt.- Patna 2. Manju Devi W/o Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Choudhary R/o Old Alamganj Chowki Near Kedarnath Math, P.S.- Alamganj, Distt.- Patna 3. Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Choudhary S/o Yoginder Choudhary R/o Old Alamganj Chowki Near Kedarnath Math, P.S.- Alamganj, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 27-01-2025 Pre-arrest bail application with regard to petitioner No.1, namely, Kumkum Kumari has already been withdrawn vide order No. 3 dated 16.01.2025. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 3. Petitioner Nos. 2 & 3 apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 4. As per prosecution case, 120 liters of country made liquor was recovered from Hanuman ghat. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82135 of 2024(4) dt.27-01-2025 2/2 incriminating material has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioners and they been made accused in this case only on suspicion. 6. However, learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner No. 2 has got six criminal antecedents out of which five antecedents are of similar nature and petitioner No. 3 has got two criminal antecedents of similar nature. 7. Considering the huge quantity of recovery and criminal antecedents of similar nature, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner Nos. 2 & 3 is refused. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T