Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83653 (KAR)

SRI. MUNIRAJU. Y. M. v. SMT. SHREEVEENA

WP/20431/2024 · 2025-09-15

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36653 WP No. 20431 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO.20431 OF 2024 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI. MUNIRAJU Y. M., S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT CHIKKAYALAVAHALLI VILLAGE, TEKAL HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA V RAYAPPA., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. SHREEVEENA, W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT ABBENAHALLI VILLAGE, MADIVALA POST, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. KESHAVA MURTHY M, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. ANITHA N, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ORDER OR DIRECTION, IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT, IN SETTING ASIDE / QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 17.02.2024 ON I.A.NO.2 IN M.C.NO.41/2020 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C., MALUR PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C TO THE WRIT PETITION; b) PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS, AS THE PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, INCLUDING THE COSTS OF THE PROCEEDINGS, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36653 WP No. 20431 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of his repeated efforts, the petitioner has not complied with the interim order passed by this Court. 2. This Court had passed an order dated 07.08.2024 and stay was granted. The petitioner is enjoying the stay from 07.08.2024 without complying with the order. In these circumstances, this Court is not even inclined to go into the merits of the matter. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. i. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No.: 3 Sl No.: 15