LAKHCHANDRA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/28774/2025 · 2025-08-06
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83652 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83652 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:133404 Court No. - 74 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 28774 of 2025 Applicant :- Lakhchandra And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Bahadur Shivhare Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Sri Tanmay Gupta, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, which is taken on record. Sri Vijay Bahadur Shivhare, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Karunakar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State, Shri Tanmay Gupta, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 and perused the material on record. The present application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of complaint case No. 1108 of 2024 as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 9.6.2025, whereby learned magistrate took cognizance under Sections 117(2), 309(4), 351(2) of B.N.S. (Sections 325, 392, 506, I.P.C.) Police Station Chikasi, District Hamirpur, pending in the court of Special Judge (D.A.A.) Hamirpur. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants does not want to press this application and wants liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. The instant application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file appropriate application/bail application/Anticipatory Bail Application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. Office shall return the certified copy of the documents to the
learned counsel for the applicants, after retaining a xerox of the same.
Order Date :- 7.8.2025 T. Sinha Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad