RAYEES AHMAD RATHER v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME)
WP(C)/1771/2025 · 2025-07-29
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8365 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8365 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No.126 SUPPLEMENTARY CAUSE LIST-II
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1771/2025 CM(4622/2025) Rayees Ahmad Rather. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Mir Umar, Advocate vice Mr. Ashiq Hussain Shah, Advocate. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Others.
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Faheem Nisar Shah, GA.
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 29.07.2025
01. The learned counsel for the petitioner for the petitioner after arguing for a while submitted that he would feel satisfied if the instant writ petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to the respondents to accord
consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner in pursuance to the order dated 6th May, 2025 passed by this Court in WP(C) 1028/2025, which till date has not been accorded due consideration.
06. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Faheem Nisar Shah, learned Government Advocate enters appearance on behalf of respondents and is not averse to the disposal of the instant petition at this stage or else to the submission made by the counsel for the petitioners. However, he submits that the representation of the petitioner would be
considered in accordance with the rules and as per law occupying the field.
02. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record.
03. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the very threshold and is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondents to accord consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner in pursuance to the order dated 6th May, 2025 passed by this Court in WP(C) 1028/2025, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, along with a copy of writ petition and the annexures appended thereto, strictly in conformity with the applicable rules and the law. The order of consideration which is likely to be passed by the respondent No. 4 be communicated to the petitioner through registered post.
04. Writ petition disposed of along with connected CM(s) in the manner indicated above.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge SRINAGAR: 29.07.2025
“HAMID”