Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83647 (KAR)

VENKATESH R v. CHENNEGOWDA C

MFA/6531/2024 · 2025-08-11

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30950 MFA No. 6531 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.6531 OF 2024(MV-I) BETWEEN: VENKATESH R., S/O. LATE M. T. RAJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO 2169, AKBAR ROAD, MANDIMOHALLA, MYSURU, PIN - 570 001. (OWNER OF TATA ACE HT BSIV BEARING REG NO. KA-09-C-7731) …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHARATH J. M., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. CHENNEGOWDA C., S/O. LATE CHIKKACHENNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO 313, 16TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR, MYSURU PIN - 570 014. 2. NINGARAJU M., S/O. MAHADEVEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT NO.6 KANDEGOWDADANAPURA VILLAGE, KYATHANAHALLI POST, HAMPAPURA HOBLI, H B KOTE TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 125. (DRIVER OF TATA ACE HT BSIV BEARING REG NO. KA-09-C-7731) Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30950 MFA No. 6531 of 2024 3. ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED NO 133, 3RD FLOOR, SHIKA TOWERS, RAMAVILAS ROAD, SUBBARAYANAKERE, MYSURU - 571 124. REP BY IT BRANCH MANAGER (POLICY NO. TAQ1023444) …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 20.06.2024 PASSED IN MVC NO.1587/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES AND SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MACT, MYSURU, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.4,50,600/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL THE DATE OF REALIZATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER No representation on appellant's side on call. The appeal was filed in the month of September, 2024 and till now office objections are not complied. Also there is no representation. All these facts reveal that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30950 MFA No. 6531 of 2024 Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE DS CT:TSM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9