Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:13809 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1051 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shashi Kant Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. Heard Sri Kailash Prakash Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. An order of transfer has been passed on 26.06.2024 which is being given effect to by passing relieving order dated 04.11.2024. 3. Learned counsel for the parties do not dispute that facts of the present petition are identical to one occurring in Service Single No.10584 of 2017, which has been disposed of on 12.5.2017. The order dated 12.5.2017 is extracted herein below:- "Heard learned Counsel for petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel. Petitioners have challenged the impugned relieving order dated 23.04.2017 passed by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Hardoi (opposite party no.4) in pursuance to the transfer order passed on 09.07.2014. It has been submitted by learned Counsel for petitioners that petitioners were transferred in the years 2014 and 2015 and now after lapse of 2-3 years, the aforesaid impugned relieving order has been passed by opposite party no.4. Learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of the instructions, has admitted that definitely, the impugned reliving order has been passed too late and, therefore, fresh orders will be passed with respect to the petitioners and other persons who have not join their services in pursuance to the transfer order passed in the years 2014 and 2015. Admittedly, there is a considerable long delay in passing the impugned and no cogent and justifiable reasons have been given for not acting upon the transfer order immediately when they were passed. Therefore, the impugned order passed in respect of petitioners is legally not sustainable and the same is hereby quashed. It is open for the opposite parties to transfer the petitioners, if exigency of service so requires, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of finally." 4. Since the issue involved in the present matter is identical, the present writ petition is also disposed of on the same terms. Order Date :- 27.1.2025 Arti Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad