Serial No. 94 Supplementary Cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1745/2025 CM(4562/2025) NISAR AHMAD DAR …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Naseer Ahmad, Advocate Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT) AND ORS ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy.AG CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE. ORDER 25.07.2025 1. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would feel satisfied, in case the present writ petition is treated as representation and the same is disposed of at this stage with a direction to the respondent No. 3 to accord consideration to the said representation within some reasonable time frame, to which the learned counsel for the respondents has no objection, provided the same is directed to be accorded consideration in accordance with the rules and as per law occupying the field. 2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for final disposal at this stage and is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 3 to treat the writ petition as representation and accord consideration to the same, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with copy of writ petition and the annexures appended thereto, strictly in conformity with the rules and as per law. The order of consideration which is likely to be passed by the said respondents be provided to the petitioner through registered post. 3. It is made clear that in case the decision which is likely to be taken on the representation of the petitioner, goes against the petitioner, he shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy under law. 4. Writ petition is disposed of along with connected CM(s) in the manner indicated above. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 25.07.2025 “Adil Ismail”