SRI. CALNOOR VENKATRAM RAJASHEKHAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/11012/2023 · 2025-12-01
E S Indiresh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83615 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83615 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49803 WP No. 11012 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 11012 OF 2023 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
SRI. CALNOOR VENKATRAM RAJASHEKHAR AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO.693/39/39-1, (OUT HOUSE) SAJJAN RAO ROAD, VISHWESHWARAPURAM, BENGALURU-560004. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANIL RAMACHANDRA, ADV. FOR SRI H R ANANTHA KRISHNA MURTHY, ADV.)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, B.M.T.F. POLICE STATION, BENGALURU-560 002.
2.
THE BANGALORE WATER
SUPPLY & SEWERAGE BOARD
CAUVERY BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD BANGALORE-560009 REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 SRI B.L. SANJEEV, ADV. FOR R2)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
Digitally signed by NANJUNDACHARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49803 WP No. 11012 of 2023
IMPUGNED NOTICE BEARING NO.BMTF/NCR/127/2021 DATED 30.03.2023 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-Q.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. The petitioner in this petition is assailing the Police Notice dated 30th March 2023 (Annexure-Q) issued by respondent No.1.
3. Having taken note of the submission made by the
learned counsel appearing for the parties, as the said Police Notice has been addressed to the petitioner at the instance of the complaint lodged by BWSSB (respondent No.2), it is open for the petitioner to reply/approach the jurisdictional Police as per Annexure-Q for redressal of the grievance, since accusation has been made against the petitioner at the instance of respondent No.2-Board.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49803 WP No. 11012 of 2023
4. In that view of the matter, no interference is called for in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
MPK CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44