Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8361 (AP)

Gundluri Munikumaramma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/5497/2022 · 2025-09-02

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010089312022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 5497/2022 Between: 1. GUNDLURI MUNIKUMARAMMA, W/O ADINARAYANA ACHARI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, RESIDENT OF D.NO.123, GANGIREDDYGARIPALLI VILLAGE, MOTUMALLELA, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR. 3. THE SUB COLLECTOR / REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ, or Direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in trying to evict the petitioner highhandedly from her property 2 admeasuring an extent of Ac.4.14 cents in Sy.No.711/12, situated in Motumallela village, Rompicherla Mandal, Chittoor District is illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violation of principles of natural justice and also violation of Article 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to dispossess the petitioner from the property admeasuring an extent of Ac.4.14 cents in Sy.No.711/ 12, situated in Motumallela village, Rompicherla Mandal, Chittoor District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to dispossess the, petitioner from the property admeasuring an extent of Ac.4.14 cents in Sy.No.711/12, situated in Motumallela village, Rompicherla Mandal, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Honourable court, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VUTUPALLI RAJANNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the 4th respondent in trying to evict the petitoenr highhandedly from her property admeasuring an extent of Ac.4.14 cents in Sy.No.711/12, situated in Motumallela Village, Rompicherla Mandal, Chittoor District. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the instructions of the 4th respondent dated 20.08.2025 submits that the petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of the subject land for the last 10 years and pattadar passbook was also issued vide Khata No.1436 of Motumallela Village of Rompicherla Mandal. No action has been taken by the 4th respondent to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, recording the said instructions of the 4th respondent dated 20.08.2025, no further orders are necessary, as there is no threat of dispossession. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 03.09.2025 NNN