IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 83982 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2024 Thana- SARE District- Nalanda ====================================================== Mahendra Dhadhi, S/o- Late Arjun Dhadhi, R/v - Oonda, P.S. - Sare , District - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Kumari Sujata Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Meena Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 05-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.Meena Singh, learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sare P.S. Case No.47 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. 3. The case of the prosecution is that when biker was intercepted by the police, he managed to escape. Altogether 20 liters of country made liquor was recovered from the bike. The petitioner was identified by the villagers. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has not committed any offence. He has been falsely implicated in the present case. He was not apprehened on the spot. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. It has Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 83982 of 2024(3) dt.05-02-2025 2/2 also been submitted that the petitioner has no concern in any way with the bike or the seized article. He is languishing in judicial custody since 01.10.2024. 5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail and submitted that from perusal of the bail petition, it transpires that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of 19 cases of similar nature. 6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that as the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of 19 cases, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected. 7. Petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of custody period of six months. lata/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T