SIDDHI VINAYAK CONSTRUCTION v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPMB/228/2024 · 2025-03-03
Ashish Naithani, G Narendar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8360 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8360 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
2025:UHC:1464-DB
WPMB No.228 of 2024 HON’BLE G. NARENDAR, C.J.
HON’BLE ASHISH NAITHANI, J.
Heard Mr. Amish Tewari,
learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he desires to withdraw the present writ petition.
3. Submission is placed on record.
4. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(ASHISH NAITHANI, J.) (G. NARENDAR, C.J.) 03.03.2025
Arti