IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1913 of 2025 ------ 1. Rambilash Yadav @ Raju, aged about 42 years, son of late Cholo Yadav, resident of Village-Chainpur, P.O. & P.S.- Domchanch, Dist.-Koderma 2. Sunil Ray, aged about 46 years, son of late Narayan Ray, resident of Village-Katiya, P.O.-Parsabad, P.S.-Jainagar, Dist.-Koderma … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Achinto Sen, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 27.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Koderma P.S. Case No.14 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 303(2)/317(2)/318(2)/336(3)/338/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, Rule 54 of JMMC Rules and under Rule 13 of the Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rule, 2017. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioner no.1 is alleged to be the owner and the petitioner no.2 is alleged to be the driver of the truck which was seized by police for transporting illegally extracted stone boulder. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and they have no concern either with the seized truck or the stone boulder. It is next submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 13 of the anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.10,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Koderma, in connection with Koderma P.S. Case No.14 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-