SRI AVINASH CHANDRAMOULI v. THE STATE REPRESENTED BY
CRL.P/10682/2023 · 2025-08-06
J M Khazi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83593 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83593 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30891 CRL.P No. 10682 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10682 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI AVINASH CHANDRAMOULI S/O CHANDRAMOULI C R AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
2.
SRI CHANDRAMOULI C R S/O K C S RAMAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
BOTH ARE PERMANENTLY R/AT NO.86, 4TH A CROSS, 36TH MAIN, BTM LAYOUT, 1ST STAGE, BENGALURU-560068
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.50/4, PON NILAYAM KANUVAI ROAD, MARUTHAM NAGAR, VADAVALLI, COIMBATORE-641041 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LOKESHA M Y, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND:
1.
THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BASAVANAGUDI POLICE STATION, BANGALORE-560104
Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30891 CRL.P No. 10682 of 2023
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS HIGH COURT, BENGALURU-01
2.
SRI GOVINDARAJU S/O VENKATARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.2/2, CHURCH ROAD, OPPOSITE TO MADHAVARAO CIRCLE, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU-560104 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.N.ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CR.NO.12/2014 NOW PENDING AS C.C.NO.17421/2014 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.463,464,465,467,471,420 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC AGAINST THE PETITIONERS AT ANNEXURE-A PENDING BEFORE THE XXXVII ACMM AT BENGALURU AGAINST THE PETITIONERS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioners.
2. No representation for petitioners even in the afternoon session.
3. This matter is of the year 2023.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30891 CRL.P No. 10682 of 2023
4. Vide order dated 24.07.2025, as a last chance, a week's time was granted to do the needful, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition.
5. Despite the same, needful has not been done. It appears petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition.
6. Hence, petition is dismissed for default.
Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE
RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19