215 DILBAG SINGH PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNA AND ANR. GOVIND DAYAL PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNA AND ANR. JAGDISH CHANDER PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, 1. are mentioned in the heading involve common question of law in the context of common set of facts and thus they are being decided by a common order. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 21 DILBAG SINGH VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNA AND ANR. GOVIND DAYAL VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNA AND ANR. JAGDISH CHANDER VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Present is the bunch of three are mentioned in the heading involve common question of law in the context of common set of facts and thus they are being decided by a common order. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 21-07-2025 1. CWP-13077-2012 (O&M) ........Petitioner VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNA AND ANR. ........Respondent(s) 2. CWP-12973-2012 (O&M) ........Petitioner VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNA AND ANR. ........Respondent(s) 3. CWP-13069-2012 (O&M) ........Petitioner VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNA AND ANR. ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Advocate J. (Oral) three writ petitions, the details of which are mentioned in the heading involve common question of law in the context of common set of facts and thus they are being decided by a common order. 2012 (O&M) 2012 (O&M) 2012 (O&M) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI writ petitions, the details of which are mentioned in the heading involve common question of law in the context of common set of facts and thus they are being decided by a common order. SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.22 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-13077-2012 (O&M) CWP-12973-2012 (O&M) and CWP-13069-2012 (O&M) -2- 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he is not in touch with the petitioners and does not know as to whether, the petitioners are interested in pursuing the present remedy or not. Hence, the present bunch of petitions may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to revive the same in case, the petitioners are alive and wants to pursue the present remedy. 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. Pending applications, if any, also stands disposed of. 5. Photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected cases. 21-07-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.22 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document