Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83566 (ALL)

SHRAVAN KUMAR PANDEY v. RAJ KUMARI AND 10 OTHERS

A227/8708/2025 · 2025-08-06

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:133546 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8708 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shravan Kumar Pandey Respondent :- Raj Kumari And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bharti Mishra Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " (i) direct the concerned court i.e. Civil Judge (S.D.), Jaunpur to expedite the 6C Application arising out of Suit No.259 of 2024 (Shravan Kumar Pandey Vs. Raj Kumari and Others) under Section 9 C.P.C., expeditiously within stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court;" 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.), Jaunpur to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 7.8.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad