- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46803 WP No. 26202 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.26202 OF 2025 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN: GOWRISHANKAR AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, W/O LATE MUTHURAJ, RESIDING AT NO.61/1-202, NEW NO.62, SARAKKI MAIN ROAD, J.P.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560078. …PETITIONER (BY SRI VISWESWARAIAH S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPT. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE DIRECTOR AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-560001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE-560001. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BANGALORE SOUTH, SOUTH END CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560004. 5. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE J.P.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560078. Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46803 WP No. 26202 of 2025 6. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (V) BESCOM, SOUTH 6TH SUB-DIVISION, J.P.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560078. 7. SMT. HEMAVATHI AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, WIFE OF NOT KNOWN NO.42A, 12TH CROSS, SARAKKI J.P.NAGAR I PHASE, BANGALORE-560078. 8. SMT. POORNIMA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, WIFE OF NAVEEN CHANDRA, NO.41, 2ND CROSS, YELLAPA GARDEN, BANAGIRINAGARA, BSK 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE-560085. 9. SMT. P. PADAMALATHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, WIFE OF N. SATHYAPRASAAD NO.1, D.K.AGENCIES, I “A” CROSS, MARENAHALI, J.P.NAGAR 2ND PHASE, BANGALORE-560078. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI RAJ KUMAR M., AGA FOR R-1 TO R-5; SRI LIKITH R. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R-6; SRI SUNDAR RAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R-9) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE LETTER DATED 19.05.2025 ISSUED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT BEARING NO. KRA.SAM.SAKANIE(V)/S-6-SAE(T)/2025-26/821 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-G AND CONSEQUENTLY TO PROVIDE POWER OF SUPPLY TO THE PETITIONER PROPERTY AND ALSO; DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS NOS.1 TO 5 TO GIVE PROTECTION TO THE PETITIONER TO LAY PIPELINE TO HIS PROPERTY BEARING NO.62, OLD NO.61/1-121, PID.NO.57-240-62, WARD NO.57, SITUATED AT SARRAKKI VILLAGE J.P.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 078 BY ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDER, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46803 WP No. 26202 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is seeking for the following reliefs: “a) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI / OR ANY OTHER WRIT/ DIRECTION / ORDER for quashing the Letter dated 19.05.2025 issued by the 6th Respondent bearing No.KRA.SAM.SAKANIE(V)/S-6- SAE(T)/2025-26/821 produced at ANNEXURE-G and consequently to provide power of supply to the Petitioner property and also; b) for a Writ of Mandamus / any order / writ / direction, directing the Respondents No.1 to 5 to give protection to the Petitioner to lay pipeline to his property bearing No.62, Old No.61/1-121, PID.No.57-240-62, Ward No.57, situated at Sarrakki Village, J.P.Nagar, Bangalore-560 078 by allowing the Writ Petition. c) Grant such other relief/s that this Hon’ble Court deems fit, in the circumstances of the case interest of justice and equity.” Brief facts: 2. The petitioner claims to be the owner in possession of property bearing No.62 old No.61/1-121, PID - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46803 WP No. 26202 of 2025 No.57-240-62, Ward No.57, situated at Sarakki Village, JP Nagar, Bengaluru, obtained through a registered gift deed dated 14.06.2010 and claims to have constructed a residential house wherein he is residing. The petitioner thereafter secured BWSSB order for water connection, paid BBMP road cutting charges, and applied to BESCOM for electricity supply. 3. Respondent Nos.7 to 9 interfered with the petitioner's possession, claiming rights under an unregistered agreement of sale dated 13.11.1991, leading to O.S. No.1182/2021 filed by the petitioner, wherein the civil Court granted an order of temporary injunction in favour of the petitioner. 4. However, respondent No.6-BESCOM rejected the request of power supply, citing pendency of the suit. Further, when the petitioner attempted to lay water pipeline in terms of BWSSB permission, respondent Nos.7 to 9 obstructed and respondent No.5 (the Inspector of Police), prevented the - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46803 WP No. 26202 of 2025 work and failed to grant protection despite subsisting injunction. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.6 cannot refuse electricity connection on the ground of pendency of civil suit, statutory services cannot be denied in the absence of a restrained order on such supply from a competent civil Court. He submits that respondent Nos.1 to 5, instead of enforcing the injunction order, which is granted in favour of the petitioner, are preventing the petitioner from exercising lawful rights and permissions issued by BWSSB and BBMP. The petitioner and his family members are residing in the constructed house without basic necessity due to the illegal action of the authorities and Annexure-G issued by respondent No.6 is arbitrary and is unsustainable. 6. Learned counsel appearing for respondent- BESCOM submits that in light of there being no clarity on ownership and since the matter is pending before the Civil - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46803 WP No. 26202 of 2025 Court, BESCOM is unable to grant electricity until final adjudication. 7. Though respondent Nos.7 to 9 are represented by counsel, there is no representation though the matter is listed for further hearing as well. 8. This Court has carefully considered the rival contentions and perused the material on record. 9. The pendency of a civil suit by itself, does not bar a statutory authority from extending essential services such as electricity and water supply, particularly in the absence of any prohibitory order from the Civil Court. The petitioner enjoys an injunction order in O.S No.1182/2021 protecting his possession. BWSSB and BBMP have issued necessary permission, and the denial of electricity by respondent No.6 is unsustainable, obstruction by private respondents cannot be a ground for denying statutory facility. However, the title dispute between the parties is pending adjudication before the Civil Court, and this Court cannot examine the disputed facts in writ jurisdiction. The parties are to pursue their - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46803 WP No. 26202 of 2025 remedy before the competent Civil Court in respect of title and permanent rights also insofar as alleged obstruction by respondent Nos.7 to 9 in laying the pipeline. Accordingly this Court pass the following: ORDER i. The writ petition is partly allowed. ii. The letter dated 19.05.2025 issued by respondent No.6 at Annexure-G is quashed. iii. Respondent No.6 is directed to provide electricity supply to the schedule property bearing No.62 old No.61/1-121, PID No.57-240-62, Ward No.57, situated at Sarakki Village, JP Nagar, Bengaluru, within two weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, subject to the petitioner complying with all the requisite procedural and safety requirements. iv. Insofar as prayer ‘b’ (seeking protection against alleged obstruction by respondent Nos.7 to 9) is concerned, it is clarified that such relief pertains to the realm of civil rights and possession. The - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46803 WP No. 26202 of 2025 petitioner is therefore reserved liberty to approach the competent Civil Court in O.S. No.1182/2021 by filing an appropriate application therein, seeking necessary civil protection and further orders for enforcement of the subsisting injunction order. v. If such an application is filed, the Civil Court shall consider such application independently and in accordance with law, without being influenced by this order. vi. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the civil rights or title of the parties. vii. All the parties are at liberty to adjudicate their rights before the competent Civil Court in O.S. No.1182/2021 and the Civil Court shall decide the same in accordance with law. Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA MBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15