M/S DHODHA HOUSE GHAZIABAD v. SURINDER KUMAR MAINGI AND ANOTHER
FAPL/233/2000 · 2025-04-15
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8356 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8356 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:55303
Court No. - 36 Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 233 of 2000 Appellant :- M/S Dhodha House Ghaziabad Respondent :- Surinder Kumar Maingi And Another Counsel for Appellant :- S.K.Singh,K.R.Sirohi Counsel for Respondent :- Vikram Nath Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
1. The matter was called out for hearing today in revise list. Despite repeated calls, none appeared on behalf of the appellant. There is also no representation on record to indicate any valid ground for non-appearance.
2. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for default of appearance.
4. However, it is made clear that the appellant shall be at liberty to file an application for restoration, if so advised, subject to showing sufficient cause for non-appearance. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 RavindraKSingh Digitally signed by :- RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad