APHC010089612020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5837/2020 Between: 1. SHAIK GHOUSIA BEGUM,, W/O MD. HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. 2. SHAIK JAKEER BEGUM,, W/O SHAMEER BASHA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. 3. SHAIK CHAND BASHA,, S/O KHAJA MIYA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 4. SHAIK HABEEB BASHA,, S/O FAREED SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. 5. SHAIK HAJI BASHA @ AZIZ BASHA,, S/O SHAIK KHAJA MEAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 6. SHAIK ASIF,, S/O AMEER, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 7. S.NAIAB,, S/O AZEEZ, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS. 8. M.ZILAN BEGUM,, S/O MOOSA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 9. S.SHAMSHUDDIN,, S/O S.M.BASHA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. 10. BASHU SAHEB,, S/O BABA SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS. 11. S.SHENAZ BEGUM,, W/O HAJI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS. 12. RAFI UNNISA BEGUM,, D/O SHAIK KHAJA MEAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. 13. SHAIK JAKEER,, S/O SHAIK HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, L.R. OF SHAIK SILAR BEE. ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF REDDYPALLE VILLAGE, PULLAMPET MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAJAMPET, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PULLAMPET POLICE STATION, PULLAMPET, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHASIDAR, PULLAMPET MANDAL, PULLAMPET, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. YANADI VENKATA SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 7. NARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 2 8. BILLUPATI RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 9. BILLUPATI LAKSHMAKKA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 10. BILLUPATI SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. RESPONDENTS 6 TO 10 ARE RESIDENTS OF VENKATESWARAPURAM VILLAGE, H/O REDDIPALLI, PULLAMPETA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 to conclude the enquiry for providing police protection to the petitioners and their properties from the hands of the respondents 6 to 10 as illegal arbitrary and violation of Articles 1z 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to initiate appropriate proceedings to curb the unofficial respondents from causing breach of peace and public tranquility” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the dispute between both the parties is purely civil in nature. In such circumstances, unless there is a specific direction to the police, it is difficult to provide police protection. 3. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to work out their remedies before appropriate forum, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:01.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.5837 of 2020 Dt.01.09.2025 Asr