Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83539 (ALL)

SHAHRUKH v. STATE OF U.P.

NABAIL/6377/2025 · 2025-09-14

Samit Gopal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 6377 of 2025 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter. Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State is present. 3. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicant- Shahrukh, seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 78 of 2020, under Sections 354, 506, 452 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Bulandshahr, during pendency of trial. 4. Even previously on 08.08.2025 there was no representation from the side of the applicant but due to incessant rainfall in the interest of justice the matter was adjourned and the following order was passed by this Court:- "1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter. Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for State for the State is present. 3. Learned counsel for the State informs the Court that as per his instructions received, the applicant has been arrested and the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ali Safdar, Haya Rizvi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shahrukh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 4. Today there is incessant rainfall since 07:30 am and there is possibility of learned counsels not able to reach the Court. 5. In view of the same, since there is no representation from the side of the applicant, in the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned for today. 6. Let the matter be listed on 29.08.2025 as fresh." 5. Learned counsel for the State informs the Court that as per his instructions the applicant has been arrested. 6. Since there is no representation from the side of the applicant, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution. September 15, 2025 AS Rathore NABAIL No. 6377 of 2025 2 (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH RATHOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad