- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31208-DB WA No. 374 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT APPEAL NO. 374 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: DILEEPA M.R. S/O RAME GOWDA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS RESIDING AT MUTHUGADA HOSURU DODDAHALLI POST ARKALGUD TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT KARNATAKA-573 133 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. RAVI H.K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR CORPORATE OFFICE, KAVERI BHAVAN K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009 2. KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SAMPIGE ROAD, 18TH CROSS MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 012 3. SRI. RAJASHEKHARA C.S. S/O SOMASHEKHARA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31208-DB WA No. 374 of 2024 RESIDING AT CHIGAHALLI VILLAGE BOOVANAHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT KARNATAKA-573 211 4. SUNIL L.M. S/O MAJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS RESIDING AT LALANAKERE VILLAGE AND POST GANDASI HOBLI, ARASIKERE TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT KARNATAKA-573 164 5. OLIVER STEVEN ALVARES S/O BERNARD ALVARES AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS RESIDING AT SY No.69/2 HEMASHREE LAYOUT CROSS ROAD VIDYANAGAR SOUTH SHIMOGA-577 203 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHANDRACHUD A., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. N.K. RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R3, R4 & R5 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO (i) SET-ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 01.12.2023 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP No.24395/2023 (S-RES) AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31208-DB WA No. 374 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal. 2. The memo reads as under:- "The appellant does not press this Writ Appeal and seeks to withdraw the same. Hence, the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the appeal in the interest of justice and equity." 3. The memo is placed on record. 4. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE RAK,List No.: 2 Sl No.: 0